Denison Organizational Culture Model
The Denison Model is the result of fifteen years of research by Dr.Daniel
Denison,formerly of the University of Michigan Business School,and currently
Professor of Organizational Development at IMD - International Institute of
Management Development in Lausanne,Switzerland,on the link between organizational
culture and bottom-line performance measures such as return on investment,sales
growth,quality,innovation and employee satisfaction.The model is the basis
for two diagnostic surveys,the Organizational Culture Survey and the Leadership
Development Survey,developed by Daniel R.Denison and William S.Neale which
have been used by over 500 organizations worldwide.
The Denison model measures four critical traits of culture and leadership
(mission,adaptability, involvement,and consistency).Each of these traits is
further broken down into three indices (for a total of 12).Click on each section
of the model to learn more about each trait and index.
Mission - Defining a meaningful long-term direction
for the organization
A mission provides purpose and meaning by defining a social role and external
goals for the organization.It provides a clear direction and goals that serve
to define an appropriate course of action for the organization and its members.A
sense of mission allows an organization to shape current behavior by envisioning
a desired future state. Being able to internalize and identify with an organization's
mission contributes to both short and long-term commitment to the organization.
Success is more likely when individuals and organizations are goal directed.
Adaptability - Translating the demands of the business
environment into action
Organizations hold a system of norms and beliefs that support the organization's
capacity to receive,interpret,and translate signals from its environment into
internal behavioral changes that increase its chances for survival,growth
and development.
Involvement - Building human capability, ownership
and responsibility
Organizational cultures characterized as "highly involved" strongly
encourage employee involvement and create a sense of ownership and responsibility.
They rely on informal,voluntary and implied control systems,rather than formal,explicit,bureaucratic
control systems.Out of this sense of ownership grows a greater commitment
to the organization and an increased capacity for autonomy. Receiving input
from organization members increases the quality of the decisions and improves
their implementation.
Consistency - Defining the values and systems that
are the basis of a strong culture
Consistency provides a central source of integration,coordination
and control.Consistent organizations develop a mindset and a set of organizational
systems that create an internal system of governance based on consensual support.They
have highly committed employees,key central values, a distinct method of doing
business,a tendency to promote from within,and a clear set of do's and don'ts.
Each of these traits is further broken down into three indices (for a total
of 12).

Features
& Applications
The Denison Organizational Culture Survey,developed by Daniel Denison and
William S.Neale,provides a way to link organizational culture to tangible
bottom-line performance measures such as:
|
|
Based on over 15 years of research involving over 1,000 organizations,Dr.Daniel Denison has studied the cultures of high and low-performing organizations.He has found that the following four culture traits can have a significant impact on organizational performance:
|
|
This survey
enables leaders,key stakeholders and employees to understand the impact their
culture has on their organization's performance and learn how to redirect
their culture to improve organizational effectiveness.
Applications include:
Product Portfolio:
Culture Products; Leadership Products
Denison Organizational Culture Survey
The Denison Organizational Culture Survey is a 60-item survey designed to
assess an organization's strengths and weaknesses as they apply to organizational
performance.The survey,developed by Daniel Denison,PhD.and William S.Neale,serves
as a diagnostic tool that has been used by over 1500 organizations globally.Using
the Denison Organizational Culture Survey,companies are able to benchmark
their organizational culture against a global database and develop an action
plan to improve their current practices.
The Denison Organizational Culture Survey has 60 items that measure specific
aspects of an organization's culture in each of the four traits and twelve
management practices identified in Dr. Denison's research.Individual surveys
are collectively tabulated into a graphical profile that compares your organization's
culture to that of higher and lower-performing organizations in our normative
database.Repeated use of the Denison Organizational Culture Survey provides
a measure of the organization's progress toward achieving optimum performance.
The survey and the prescriptive suggestions are written in easily understood
business terms,making it an easy to use and powerful tool.
A Typical Case

Culture Profile of a Manufacturing Company in Decline
This is the
organizational culture profile of a hundred-year-old manufacturing company,which
was the first in the industry.Facing competition,the price of their products
is going down.This company has been in decline in the past five years. Last
year was the first time in 20 years that it failed to meet targets and all
the senior management didn't get their bonus.The scores are normed,which means
that the data from the surveys are compared with the responses that have been
reported for the over 700 organizations in the norm database. For example,receiving
a 82nd percentile score for "core values" means that 82 percent
of organizations scored lower than this organization on this index.The survey
results reveals a few critical questions: all the indices under "Adaptability"
are fairly low,esp.for "creating change" and "organizational
learning"; the indices under "Mission" are quite low, with
the only exception of "goals & objectives"; "Involvement"
is low, with only "team orientation" relatively high;the only strength
lies in "Consistency", esp.in "core values".
After looking at the results,the senior management team fell into log silence.
When the consultant asked them,"What does this say about your company?
"After some time, one of them answered,"We are a team all right,
but we are going down together". Their core values used to make
the company very successful in the past,but it may not be suitable for the
company's future.The leadership team soon related the results to their present
situation:they are highly focused on the operations, while neglected the long-term
strategy; they are building a lot of teams,yet the team approach does not
have an impact on the way work is actually performed.
Denison
Leadership Development Survey
The Denison Leadership Development Survey, developed by Daniel Denison,PhD.and
William S.Neale,is a diagnostic tool that provides leaders and managers with
feedback on a set of twelve leadership skills and practices that can impact
bottom-line organizational performance.This 360-degree instrument is the result
of over 20 years of research by Dr. Daniel Denison that examines the relationship
between leadership,organizational culture and organizational effectiveness.
The 96 items in the Denison Leadership Development Survey measure specific
aspects of an individual manager's leadership skills and practices,and benchmarks
them to other leaders.The survey also compares an individual manager's self-perception
with that of his/her co-workers using confidential 360-degree feedback. Surveys
are collectively tabulated into the individual's data file,and results are
graphically presented in a Summary Report.The survey, Summary Report and Action
Planning Guide are written in easily understood business terms, making the
Denison Leadership Development Survey a powerful tool for leadership development.
A Typical Case

This is the profile of a typical effective leader.He is recently hired as president of a major retail company.He is known for his ability to increase sales,quality and profits.Look at the ratings of self (left) and all other raters combined (right) on each index,what can you tell about this leader? Do the bullet points below confirm some of your observation?
Denison
Leadership Development Survey: For Individual Contributors
The Denison Leadership Development Survey: For Individual Contributors was
developed in response to client requests for a 360-degree assessment tool
that could be applied to non-supervisory employees.A slightly shorter version
of the Denison Leadership Development Survey,this tool is highly useful for
professional and leadership development.
Like the Denison Leadership Development Survey, the Denison Leadership Development
Survey: For Individual Contributors is based on the Denison Model.The survey
is a 60-item instrument designed to give a simple,yet comprehensive analysis
of the skills of individual contributors in an organization by evaluating
the underlying leadership traits and work practices that influence organizational
performance.
MGP Leadership 360 Survey Introduction
MGP leadership 360 survey provides an opportunity for the assessee to obtain feedback from colleagues, boss, direct reports on his or her leadership competency and style as well as others' perception of his or her strength and development needs on major competency dimensions. Also, it helps define the gap between the assessee's competency profile and the requirement of his/her current or future position, so the person can bridge the gap through follow up coaching and development plans.
- Strategic Thinking
- Analysis & Problem Solving, Judgment & Decisiveness
- Organizing & Planning
- Execution & Implementation
- Customer Focus & External Relationships
- Self Management
- People Management & Development
- Chang & Innovation
- Influence & Communication
- Provide a comprehensive picture of a person's performance effectiveness as well as strength level on all the major competency aspects;
- Help compare the gap between self evaluation and combined others' evaluation in terms of areas to further develop;
Help understand the different aspects of leadership profile;- Help clarify the gap between the person's current status and the corporate requirement and needs;
- Provide some valuable data input to the person for further development


Sample graph of comparison of self-evaluation
and combined other rater groups

Detailed scores of assessee's
strength and challenges
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||